Ancient Inventions and Anthropology

ANCIENT INVENTIONS: - In Alexandria and in the Cave of Hathor seemed no reason to believe we had electricity. There is no doubt that fraudulent traders were using electrum plating techniques to make gold plate on other metals to sell as pure gold. Some think the cave drawings show electrical wiring ducts, and I think it might be phosphorous slush in the pipes to make the light which has been painted by artists from the cave. There are professors who would have us believe there is no reason a carbon wax or oil burning lamps has to do with blind artisans. Thales had a small steam engine, the lighthouse of Alexandria and their tri-level sea from ships, slot machines and other things lead the authors of Ancient Inventions to say that we can build something that could build up to half of the twentieth century . They detail the capacity building of ports and many other things. There is much more than it speaks for us to learn or re-know, and many whole disciplines or things we have not yet re-discovered.

ANTHROPOLOGY: - There are many examples of how forced''direct inference theorization rather than 'observation and conclusion' to measure all the facts in every field of science. Anthropologists in Polynesia say the natives who came from SE Asia, despite the claims that were native from South America or even the Nootka / Haida nation in the Pacific Northwest. Thor Heyerdahl proved the natives have been corrected. The lack of willingness to accept that humans have been ingenious and inventive enough to create rafts is almost funny. There is evidence that botanical vegetation of Hawaii is not all indigenous and came from the Caroline Islands of 1500 miles away. A cable TV documentary showed how the rites of the Caroline Islanders involve some sort of movement and rescue have already established that in 150,000 BC these islanders traveled to Hawaii on huge rafts with outriggers. The vines jungles' records and make a raft in ancient times, including the development of hominids.

The anthropologists as a whole are more open-minded, despite having committed many errors ruling that the conventional wisdom and the funding process have contributed to the grand manner. We are always looking for facts and opinions of what academia calls Mavericks are able to illuminate the past in all disciplines of anthropology and archeology. Gimbutas and Campbell have followed a long line of independent thought from Humboldt and Hawkes, Petrie and Marshack. Eventually led to mythology in the foreground through the use of techniques such as photos of the area and we now have solid state chemistry and genetics to trace new routes. There is still a lot of petty provincial 'pissing-contests' between different disciplines, but there are a lot of interesting things are made. The cases of researchers spending up to twenty years working and living with the natives, who tell them what they want to hear because they are nice and kind, are numerous. (6) The value systems of our researchers who want to position themselves and Euro-centric financial supporters more civilized are rife in the annals of what some say is anything but a science.

When a group of natives who will monitor the academic mindset and linear logic is actually able to educate the 'experts' of their culture that is the exception. Often these things are not funded because the data does not 'fit' the prevailing literature. Carlos Castaneda was an anthropologist from UCLA who made a breakthrough on his own. Even his debunkers have to admit that took a lot of knowledge to the field as a whole. Dr. Wayne Dyer owes a lot of thought involved in its'll see, when you believe it the work of Carlos Castaneda and his Toltec mentor Don Juan. It 'possible that all our research on human behavior has more to learn what we think we already know. This could mean that we are wrong on many fundamental things. One of the most obvious things that our cultural bias foists data is the relative importance we place on intellect rather than spirit.